Little Rock Multiple DUI & DWI Lawyer

Aggressive Defense for Repeat DUI & DWI Offenders in Arkansas

Being arrested for a DUI/DWI is a serious matter. If you have been arrested for a second or subsequent DUI/DWI, you are facing even more severe consequences. It is important to have an experienced Little Rock multiple DUI & DWI defense attorney on your side to protect your rights and fight for you. At Collins, Collins & Ray, we can provide you with the strong legal representation you need. With a commitment to defending our client's rights, we stand as a reliable ally in the face of complex legal proceedings.

Call Collins, Collins & Ray today at (501) 392-5007 or contact us online to schedule a consultation with our multiple DUI & DWI attorneys in Little Rock.

What is Considered a Multiple DUI & DWI?

Multiple DUI (Driving Under the Influence) and DWI (Driving While Intoxicated) charges arise when an individual is arrested for operating a vehicle under the influence of alcohol or drugs more than once. In Arkansas, the legal blood alcohol concentration (BAC) limit is 0.08%. If a driver is found to exceed this limit during a traffic stop, they may be charged with DUI or DWI.

A multiple DUI or DWI occurs when an individual faces these charges on more than one occasion within a specified time frame. Subsequent charges often result in more severe penalties, making it crucial for those facing such situations to seek professional legal counsel promptly.

What are the Penalties for a Multiple DUI/DWI in Arkansas?

The penalties for multiple DUI/DWI convictions in Arkansas can be severe and escalate with each subsequent offense. It is imperative to understand the potential consequences associated with these charges:

• Fines: Individuals convicted of multiple DUI or DWI offenses may face substantial fines. These financial penalties can place a significant burden on individuals and their families.
• License Suspension: Multiple DUI/DWI convictions can lead to the suspension or revocation of a driver's license. The duration of the suspension increases with each subsequent offense, severely impacting an individual's ability to commute and maintain employment.
• Ignition Interlock Device: In some cases, the court may order the installation of an ignition interlock device in the offender's vehicle. This device requires the driver to pass a breathalyzer test before starting the vehicle.
• Probation: Offenders may be placed on probation, requiring compliance with specific conditions, such as attending alcohol education programs, submitting to regular drug testing, and maintaining good behavior.
• Jail Time: Multiple DUI/DWI convictions often result in mandatory jail sentences, with the duration increasing for each subsequent offense. Jail time not only disrupts one's personal and professional life but also carries long-term consequences.

Defenses Against Multiple DUI & DWI Charges

Mounting a strong defense against multiple DUI/DWI charges is crucial for minimizing the potential consequences. Some common defenses against multiple DUI & DWI charges may include:

• Illegal Stop or Arrest: We can thoroughly examine the circumstances leading to the traffic stop and arrest to determine if law enforcement observed proper procedures. If there were violations of constitutional rights, we work to have the evidence suppressed.
• Field Sobriety Tests: We can scrutinize the administration and accuracy of field sobriety tests, challenging their reliability as evidence. Factors such as weather conditions, physical health, and other variables can impact test performance.
• Breathalyzer Accuracy: We can investigate the maintenance and calibration records of breathalyzer devices to ensure their accuracy. An improperly calibrated device can yield unreliable BAC results.
• Rising Blood Alcohol Content (BAC): We can explore the possibility that an individual's BAC was below the legal limit at the time of driving but increased by the time of testing, known as the "rising BAC" defense.
• Violation of Miranda Rights: If law enforcement fails to inform the individual of their Miranda rights during the arrest, we may challenge the admissibility of statements made during questioning.